2.011.9: fix an error message (lp#693886). Thanks to Attila Lendvai.

asdf.asd

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
   :licence "MIT"
   :description "Another System Definition Facility"
   :long-description "ASDF builds Common Lisp software organized into defined systems."
-  :version "2.011.8"
+  :version "2.011.9"
   ;;:version #.(asdf:asdf-version) ; how do we make that the *described* ASDF's version rather than the *previously loaded* ASDF's version?
   :depends-on ()
   :components

asdf.lisp

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
          ;; "2.345.6" would be a development version in the official upstream
          ;; "2.345.0.7" would be your seventh local modification of official release 2.345
          ;; "2.345.6.7" would be your seventh local modification of development version 2.345.6
-         (asdf-version "2.011.8")
+         (asdf-version "2.011.9")
          (existing-asdf (fboundp 'find-system))
          (existing-version *asdf-version*)
          (already-there (equal asdf-version existing-version)))
@@ -1681,8 +1681,7 @@ recursive calls to traverse.")
                              required-op required-c required-v))
       (retry ()
         :report (lambda (s)
-                  (format s "~@<Retry loading component ~S.~@:>"
-                          (component-find-path required-c)))
+                  (format s "~@<Retry loading component ~S.~@:>" required-c))
         :test
         (lambda (c)
           (or (null c)

test/run-shell-command-test.script

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 (load-asdf)
 
 ;;; test asdf run-shell-command function
-;;; Stas Bokuraev found (and fixed) a bug where on clisp asdf:run-shell-command might not return
+;;; Stas Boukarev found (and fixed) a bug where on clisp asdf:run-shell-command might not return
 ;;; the right value.  This attemtps to test for that.
 (quit-on-error
  (assert (eql 1 (asdf:run-shell-command "/usr/bin/false")))